| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cat(h) Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
I caught this programme on More 4 last night. Between that and a few
other bits of anectodal evidence, I am just wondering if the public
opinion is turning for the more favourable towards British farmers?
What do the farmers on here think?
Cat(h) (genuinely interested, not trying to stir pots) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Tim Lamb Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:32 pm Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
In message <1180524208.167013.17010@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"Cat(h)" <cathy_ie@yahoo.com> writes
| Quote: |
I caught this programme on More 4 last night. Between that and a few
other bits of anectodal evidence, I am just wondering if the public
opinion is turning for the more favourable towards British farmers?
What do the farmers on here think?
|
I watched the first showing.
I suppose it was fairly factual and certainly didn't pull any punches.
Perhaps hunting should stand or fall on the question of *unacceptable
cruelty* with fallen livestock and employment as side issues.
I assume most farmers would support hunting with hounds but doubt that
many take part themselves.
regards
--
Tim Lamb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cat(h) Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:55 pm Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
On May 30, 1:32 pm, Tim Lamb <t...@marford.demon.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: |
In message <1180524208.167013.17...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"Cat(h)" <cathy...@yahoo.com> writes
I caught this programme on More 4 last night. Between that and a few
other bits of anectodal evidence, I am just wondering if the public
opinion is turning for the more favourable towards British farmers?
What do the farmers on here think?
I watched the first showing.
I suppose it was fairly factual and certainly didn't pull any punches.
Perhaps hunting should stand or fall on the question of *unacceptable
cruelty* with fallen livestock and employment as side issues.
I assume most farmers would support hunting with hounds but doubt that
many take part themselves.
|
That's the thing - I think while the programme may have started life
as an investigation in the realities of fox hunting, it ended up being
about something totally different.
Molly Dineen asked rather interesting questions - directly and
indirectly - about the economics of British farming. In particular,
she contrasted the national outrage at foxes being killed by hounds
with the blissful ignorance of the fact that uneconomic beef and
cattle prices lead to wholesale slaughter of value-less, though
perfectly healthy, calves the length and breadth of the country, and
dramatic economic hardship on many farms. And by extension, the
contradiction in the public's acquiescence of the "cheap food policy",
which has led to such obscenities, and their righteous indignation at
the killing of foxes.
I thought it was quite shocking, and not because of the blood and gore
which most of us country dwellers would not have been particularly
shocked by. She also illustrated rather well the heights of insane
bureaucracy being heaped on farmers for no economic return.
Could it be that the British media, and the public, are starting to
question their taking for granted of British farmers? Or am I just
deluding myself?
Cat(h) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jim Webster Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
"Cat(h)" <cathy_ie@yahoo.com> wrote in message .
| Quote: |
I thought it was quite shocking, and not because of the blood and gore
which most of us country dwellers would not have been particularly
shocked by. She also illustrated rather well the heights of insane
bureaucracy being heaped on farmers for no economic return.
Could it be that the British media, and the public, are starting to
question their taking for granted of British farmers? Or am I just
deluding myself?
Cat(h)
|
I don;t think you are deluding yourself, I suspect we are in a period of
change, such things as biofuels, the rest of the world becoming wealthy, and
rising populations are going to put agriculture into a different perspective
At some point there is going to be a noticable shortage of a food type and
people will ask serious questions
Jim Webster |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
greymaus Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:20 am Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
On 2007-05-30, Cat(h) <cathy_ie@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
I caught this programme on More 4 last night. Between that and a few
other bits of anectodal evidence, I am just wondering if the public
opinion is turning for the more favourable towards British farmers?
What do the farmers on here think?
Cat(h) (genuinely interested, not trying to stir pots)
Not British, Irish, but of the opinion that the general public don't |
give a damn, just want food (or what the supermarkets call food) as
cheap as possible.
--
Greymaus
Just another grumpy old man |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
greymaus Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:20 am Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
On 2007-05-30, Tim Lamb <tim@marford.demon.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: |
In message <1180524208.167013.17010@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"Cat(h)" <cathy_ie@yahoo.com> writes
I caught this programme on More 4 last night. Between that and a few
other bits of anectodal evidence, I am just wondering if the public
opinion is turning for the more favourable towards British farmers?
What do the farmers on here think?
I watched the first showing.
I suppose it was fairly factual and certainly didn't pull any punches.
Perhaps hunting should stand or fall on the question of *unacceptable
cruelty* with fallen livestock and employment as side issues.
I assume most farmers would support hunting with hounds but doubt that
many take part themselves.
regards
|
Suprising numbers of people here with interest in horse hunting,
arrivestas, people with a yen for that sort of excercise, and the
remains of the landed gentry. Largely, we have lost the social split in
the countryside that feulled the argument in the U.K ( which is why
there is no real effort to get people over to hunt.)..
--
Greymaus
Just another grumpy old man |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cat(h) Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:45 am Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
On May 30, 7:05 pm, "Jim Webster"
<j...@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Cat(h)" <cathy...@yahoo.com> wrote in message .
I thought it was quite shocking, and not because of the blood and gore
which most of us country dwellers would not have been particularly
shocked by. She also illustrated rather well the heights of insane
bureaucracy being heaped on farmers for no economic return.
Could it be that the British media, and the public, are starting to
question their taking for granted of British farmers? Or am I just
deluding myself?
Cat(h)
I don;t think you are deluding yourself, I suspect we are in a period of
change, such things as biofuels, the rest of the world becoming wealthy, and
rising populations are going to put agriculture into a different perspective
At some point there is going to be a noticable shortage of a food type and
people will ask serious questions
|
I see you share my opinion. I find it regrettable that it takes
shortages to make populace and governments take note, but that's just
me being idealist.
I look forward to a world where the role of primary food producers is
valued and appreciated again. That's me being even more idealist.
Anyway, I thought the programme was a very interesting, and
refreshingly realistic take on farming.
Cat(h) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cat(h) Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:50 am Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
On May 30, 11:20 pm, greymaus <greym...@gmaildo.tcom> wrote:
| Quote: |
On 2007-05-30, Cat(h) <cathy...@yahoo.com> wrote:> I caught this programme on More 4 last night. Between that and a few
other bits of anectodal evidence, I am just wondering if the public
opinion is turning for the more favourable towards British farmers?
What do the farmers on here think?
Cat(h) (genuinely interested, not trying to stir pots)
Not British, Irish, but of the opinion that the general public don't
give a damn, just want food (or what the supermarkets call food) as
cheap as possible.
--
Greymaus
Just another grumpy old man
|
Irish too - well, sort of - and the General Public is a very weird
creature. Professing to want high quality, environmentally and animal
welfare sensitive, food, provided it's cheap. Then go and buy
Brazilian beef.
Cat(h) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
David G. Bell Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 7:26 am Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
On Wednesday, in article
<5c5smjF2qor3oU1@mid.individual.net>
jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk "Jim Webster" wrote:
| Quote: |
"Cat(h)" <cathy_ie@yahoo.com> wrote in message .
I thought it was quite shocking, and not because of the blood and gore
which most of us country dwellers would not have been particularly
shocked by. She also illustrated rather well the heights of insane
bureaucracy being heaped on farmers for no economic return.
Could it be that the British media, and the public, are starting to
question their taking for granted of British farmers? Or am I just
deluding myself?
I don;t think you are deluding yourself, I suspect we are in a period of
change, such things as biofuels, the rest of the world becoming wealthy, and
rising populations are going to put agriculture into a different perspective
At some point there is going to be a noticable shortage of a food type and
people will ask serious questions
|
Or just blame the farmers.
How many people ask questions, and how many just parrot media hype?
--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
On the horizon, a carrier task force of the Salvation Navy was
turning into the wind, preparing to launch Zeppelins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jim Webster Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:05 am Post subject: Re: The Lie of the Land |
|
|
""David G. Bell"" <dbell@zhochaka.org.uk> wrote in message
news:20070531.0726.108300snz@zhochaka.org.uk...
| Quote: |
On Wednesday, in article
5c5smjF2qor3oU1@mid.individual.net
jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk "Jim Webster" wrote:
"Cat(h)" <cathy_ie@yahoo.com> wrote in message .
I thought it was quite shocking, and not because of the blood and gore
which most of us country dwellers would not have been particularly
shocked by. She also illustrated rather well the heights of insane
bureaucracy being heaped on farmers for no economic return.
Could it be that the British media, and the public, are starting to
question their taking for granted of British farmers? Or am I just
deluding myself?
I don;t think you are deluding yourself, I suspect we are in a period of
change, such things as biofuels, the rest of the world becoming wealthy,
and
rising populations are going to put agriculture into a different
perspective
At some point there is going to be a noticable shortage of a food type
and
people will ask serious questions
Or just blame the farmers.
How many people ask questions, and how many just parrot media hype?
|
first someone will cry
"Something must be done"
The government with do "something" pretty much at random which might make
things worst but the public will probably not realise until after the next
general election
But eventually, if they want to eat, they'll have to pay for it because
others out there will buy it from under their noses
Jim Webster |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

124 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|